redandwhite1874 wrote:Martin still has lots and lots to prove, and no hiding from mistakes or areas we could have done better in, but I think we got 49 points in 2009/10 so we need to get beyond that to have our best finish since the 1930s in the top division.
Still it will be only our third success in staying in the top division since the 30's and yet some folk think the board are not interested in success or Accies; and indeed some think the board need to justify that sustainable finances and youth development is the way ahead
No it was 49 points Hearts on 48. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009%E2% ... ier_LeagueTodd_is_God wrote:We did not, we finished with 50; 1 more than Hearts in 6th
AmanAccie wrote:No it was 49 points Hearts on 48. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009%E2% ... ier_LeagueTodd_is_God wrote:We did not, we finished with 50; 1 more than Hearts in 6th
Indeed we do lolTodd_is_God wrote:AmanAccie wrote:No it was 49 points Hearts on 48. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009%E2% ... ier_LeagueTodd_is_God wrote:We did not, we finished with 50; 1 more than Hearts in 6th
Then we both stand corrected
YeOldeHamiltonian wrote:Not a successful season sorry.The season where we should have got to Europe is how I will always remember it.
The game last night reinforced this.A bit of tinkering and some prudent buys and we would be at least fourth....maybe third.
Park Materson wrote:What a bunch of sad, unambitious happy clappers like ogg post on here.
redandwhite1874 wrote:I would suggest that the terms successful and disappointing (perhaps very) can both be applied to this season; they are not exclusive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 143 guests