H9crx wrote:If true we can not stand in his way! Would be a good move for him!
I have no problems with okayers moving on like #22 I do have the fear about who Less would bring in to replace him.
redandwhite1874 wrote:H9crx wrote:If true we can not stand in his way! Would be a good move for him!
I have no problems with okayers moving on like #22 I do have the fear about who Less would bring in to replace him.
Is this the same Les that brought him here in the first place ?
H9crx wrote:redandwhite1874 wrote:H9crx wrote:If true we can not stand in his way! Would be a good move for him!
I have no problems with okayers moving on like #22 I do have the fear about who Less would bring in to replace him.
Is this the same Les that brought him here in the first place ?
Now now I think we all know that when Alex was in charge we got good players!(yes man with an eye for a olayer) Befour and after Alex we have had duds! #wheressumsky rose tinted googles
glasgow accie wrote:We will never know the answer to that one though .......
Gaspode wrote:glasgow accie wrote:We will never know the answer to that one though .......
He played more than Sumsky and Lucas for the 20's so it's fair to assume he was not up to the standard required or he would still be here like the aforementioned two who, despite not playing, are still here.
H9crx wrote:Gaspode wrote:glasgow accie wrote:We will never know the answer to that one though .......
He played more than Sumsky and Lucas for the 20's so it's fair to assume he was not up to the standard required or he would still be here like the aforementioned two who, despite not playing, are still here.
Or He was good had an opportunity to play football some wher else wher sumsky has no where to go and is signed for 12m and is happy to pick up a money.
H9crx wrote:Ok where's your sorce that the club said he could go on and it was not him asking to leave as he was pissed off not getting a game when we were getting pumed every week.
I was stating a different interpretation on the matter as you me and the rest of the fans know Jack!
My point was he may be a good player and got the nod of a contract and a game back in Irland. The ethos would not allow the club to stand in his way!
You are always at me for my negitive posts . I have never stated anything about your oranother posters who do not share my views! But why up am I wrong as you do not agree with my views?
your constent trolling and snide coments says a lot!
H9crx wrote:Not rated in the eyes of the new coaches doesn't not make you a bad player player.
H9crx wrote:Ye could not get down what I was looking to say.
The point was that by not being liked my one manager does not state you are a bad player or a poor signing. History has shown that players who have left various clubs have been fantastic else where. I don't think lynch would have been a bad player. In football you go where you are wanted Or get a game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests